Non-STEM IAs That Actually Impress.
- Feb 5
- 2 min read

Many non-STEM IB students believe Internal Assessments don’t matter much outside final grades. In reality, strong IAs quietly reinforce academic depth, especially for humanities and social-science applicants.
Universities don’t read your IAs — but they see the signals your IAs send through subject choice, grades, teacher references, and overall coherence.
This blog explains what kinds of non-STEM IAs actually impress universities, and
what types tend to fade into the background.
How Universities Indirectly Evaluate IAs
IAs influence admissions through:
Final subject grades
Predicted scores
Teacher commentary
Academic consistency
A strong IA strengthens the academic story behind your grades.
What Makes an IA Impressive
IA Quality | Admissions Signal |
Clear research question | Strong depth |
Sustained analysis | High rigor |
Independent thinking | Very strong |
Original insight | Strong |
Overly descriptive work | Weak |
Depth > novelty.
English A IAs That Stand Out
What impresses:
Focused literary analysis
Clear argumentative line
Sophisticated textual evidence
Avoid:
Plot-heavy discussion
Broad theme dumping
Strong English IAs signal writing readiness.
History IAs That Impress
Best approaches:
Narrow, researchable questions
Use of primary sources
Clear historiographical thinking
Universities value method over topic.
Economics IAs That Work for Non-STEM Profiles
Strong Econ IAs show:
Real-world application
Balanced evaluation
Conceptual clarity
Avoid:
Over-quantification without insight
Even non-Econ majors benefit from well-reasoned analysis.
Psychology IAs That Signal Depth
What works:
Clear experimental logic
Ethical awareness
Analytical discussion
The discussion section matters more than results.
Global Politics & ESS IAs
Impressive elements:
Case-based inquiry
Theoretical application
Balanced perspectives
Shows interdisciplinary readiness.
The Role of Reflection & Evaluation
Universities value:
Awareness of limitations
Intellectual humility
Evidence-based conclusions
Reflection = maturity.
Common IA Mistakes That Dilute Impact
Choosing flashy topics without depth
Over-describing sources
Ignoring evaluation sections
Prioritising format over thinking
A polished shallow IA doesn’t impress.
Country-Wise Impact of Strong IAs
Country | IA Influence |
US | Moderate (indirect) |
UK | Low (grade-based) |
Netherlands | Low-moderate |
Canada | Moderate |
Hong Kong | Moderate |
IAs matter through grades and coherence.
Frequently Asked Questions ( FAQs )
1. Do universities read IAs?
No but they see the results.
2. Does topic choice matter?
Less than analysis quality.
3. Are interdisciplinary IAs valued?
Yes if executed well.
4. Can a weak IA hurt admissions?
Indirectly, through grades.
Final Takeaway
Impressive non-STEM IAs show how you think, not how complex your topic sounds.
Strong analysis quietly strengthens your entire application.
Focus on clarity, depth, and reasoning — the rest follows.



Comments