top of page

Non-STEM IAs That Actually Impress.

  • Feb 5
  • 2 min read
Non-STEM IAs.
Non-STEM IAs.

Many non-STEM IB students believe Internal Assessments don’t matter much outside final grades. In reality, strong IAs quietly reinforce academic depth, especially for humanities and social-science applicants.


Universities don’t read your IAs — but they see the signals your IAs send through subject choice, grades, teacher references, and overall coherence.


This blog explains what kinds of non-STEM IAs actually impress universities, and

what types tend to fade into the background.



How Universities Indirectly Evaluate IAs


IAs influence admissions through:


  • Final subject grades

  • Predicted scores

  • Teacher commentary

  • Academic consistency


A strong IA strengthens the academic story behind your grades.


What Makes an IA Impressive

IA Quality

Admissions Signal

Clear research question

Strong depth

Sustained analysis

High rigor

Independent thinking

Very strong

Original insight

Strong

Overly descriptive work

Weak

Depth > novelty.


English A IAs That Stand Out


What impresses:


  • Focused literary analysis

  • Clear argumentative line

  • Sophisticated textual evidence


Avoid:


  • Plot-heavy discussion

  • Broad theme dumping


Strong English IAs signal writing readiness.


History IAs That Impress


Best approaches:


  • Narrow, researchable questions

  • Use of primary sources

  • Clear historiographical thinking


Universities value method over topic.


Economics IAs That Work for Non-STEM Profiles


Strong Econ IAs show:


  • Real-world application

  • Balanced evaluation

  • Conceptual clarity


Avoid:


  • Over-quantification without insight

Even non-Econ majors benefit from well-reasoned analysis.


Psychology IAs That Signal Depth


What works:


  • Clear experimental logic

  • Ethical awareness

  • Analytical discussion


The discussion section matters more than results.


Global Politics & ESS IAs


Impressive elements:


  • Case-based inquiry

  • Theoretical application

  • Balanced perspectives


Shows interdisciplinary readiness.


The Role of Reflection & Evaluation


Universities value:


  • Awareness of limitations

  • Intellectual humility

  • Evidence-based conclusions


Reflection = maturity.




Common IA Mistakes That Dilute Impact


  • Choosing flashy topics without depth

  • Over-describing sources

  • Ignoring evaluation sections

  • Prioritising format over thinking


A polished shallow IA doesn’t impress.


Country-Wise Impact of Strong IAs

Country

IA Influence

US

Moderate (indirect)

UK

Low (grade-based)

Netherlands

Low-moderate

Canada

Moderate

Hong Kong

Moderate

IAs matter through grades and coherence.


Frequently Asked Questions ( FAQs )


1. Do universities read IAs?

No but they see the results.


2. Does topic choice matter?

Less than analysis quality.


3. Are interdisciplinary IAs valued?

Yes if executed well.


4. Can a weak IA hurt admissions?

Indirectly, through grades.



Final Takeaway


Impressive non-STEM IAs show how you think, not how complex your topic sounds.


Strong analysis quietly strengthens your entire application.


Focus on clarity, depth, and reasoning — the rest follows.

Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
bottom of page